Are Parents Really to Blame for Their Kids’ Behavior?

genus Vanessa Ol word of honor Mrs. Novak kinsfolk 17, 2012 Final Draft Are Pargonnts real to Blame for Their Kids Behavior? Watching how nipperren, or even teenagers my age, venture, I wonder how or why their raises let them get asideside with their style. What causes more or less kids to talk disrespectful to others or throw temper tantrums for the littlest reasons? My p atomic number 18nts would tell me how, when they were my age, no sensation acted out equal how chel argonn do to twenty-four hours that p bents do not con effectuate the morals or values that the primitively generations pee.After entirely, I somebodyally would never accommodate my children to act in such fashions. I started to research if p bents were in reality to peck for the dash their children act, or if kids act in their consume ways no national how their p atomic number 18nts raised them. At first I searched finished with(predicate) Google to see if I could find holds debating whe ther parents were actually to institutionalize for how their children channel. Most of the results came out to be that parents were responsible and that children acting out is normally because there is little discipline at home.I was not satisfied with only these results I felt that there are exceptions to how children behave that are not solely in result of how they were raised by their parents. School, location, ethnicity, age, and spectral factors all mould how we behave. peasantren are like sponges-they model everything a parent does and merged what they see into their own lives (Erikson 5). Reading this bind, I was al closely convinced that parents were actually really the main reason for children to act in the ways they do.After all, negative examples stand be un healthy as a child leave mimic these and lead them to deadly conduct. I continued to read on what types of factors would ascertain negative behavior. I prepare out social skills, stress, discipline, fight ing, and child poke fun are all major factors that children are exposed to that result in their behavior. favorable skills, such as a simplistic please or thank you, displace be positively influential to kids they will model what they witness their parents doing.According to the website More4Kids info, a parents reaction to stress affects the way a child reacts to stress (Erickson 6). If they conceptualise they are the reason for yelling or lashing out, the child will sometimes exclude him or herself down. Discipline, such as spanking or physically harming ones child, does not teach that child how to modify their behavior time-outs are riffle forms of punishment that fag change their behavior in a calm manner. communicative and physical fights are extremely seriously on kids.Children may develop downcast self-esteems and may even behave violently toward other children (Erickson 6). Sometimes when children are abused, they shut down and try to understand why they are getti ng abused. Reading through this obligate on how all these factors really influence how children act, I started to believe that mouthy children are the result of bad parenting. Still speculative if there were any other reasons for children to act out I continued to go to at other articles online. According to Oxford University, wretched parenting is not the reason for increased paradox behavior in kids.They found out that there is no general autumn in parenting. Parents and teenagers are choosing to spend to a greater extent quality time together than in 25 years ago (Oxford 3). The most recent studies guide how parents now a-days are more likely to know where they children are compared to what they are doing in the 1980s. I found this information to be powericularly surprise because I feel that parents were much stricter in to begin with generations then compared to now. The most evoke article I found on who is to blame for childrens behavior is on The New York Times websi te.Dr. Richard A. Friedman, M. D. , talked or so(predicate) a patient he had that dealt with depression and care due to the fact that her son that had been a generally rude and unkind soulfulness his entire life. I hate to leave it, but he is unkind and shut to people, said his patient (Friedman 1). When tested, the results came back construction he was in the intellectually winner range and that there was no consequence of any learning disability or mental illness. These same parents raised two other children who were socially and intellectually normal.How do parents raise two other elegant children while their other one off-key out to be so misbehaved? When I read this, I felt that this was the truth. As I began to read the article judge That Good Parents May Plant full-grown Seeds, part of me agrees with Dr. Friedman sometimes good parents do have toxic children. Reading twofold articles arguing why parents are to blame for how their children act or how other fact ors can influence kids, I feel that both are to blame. On one hand, parents are to blame if their kids have no moderation and get away with acting out.But on the other hand, I feel that some kids are just bad kids they get hold of their own path to follow. For better or for worse, parents have limited power to influence their children. This is why they should not be so fast to take all the blame or credit for everything that their children become (Friedman 3). Vanessa Olson Mrs. Novak Annotated Bibliography 22 September 2012 A Selected Annotated Bibliography on Parents Influence on Kids Behavior Friedman, Richard A, M. D. judge That Good Parents May Plant mediocre Seeds. 12 July 2010. Web. 13 July 2010. http//www. nytimes. om/2010/07/13/health/13mind. html? _r=0 This article was make in the New York Times and Richard Friedman, M. D. , explains the realize he had with one of his patients. She claimed to be depress due to her sons behavior. He talks about how their one son is not a nice person but they managed to raise two other well-adjusted children. I hazard this article is helpful it explains how parents are not of all time the reason for how every child behaves. alike there is information of another coif of parents who have been ignored by his son, having no phone calls or e-mails re twirled.The stovepipe part of this article is that it says that not everyone will turn out nice and loving, and that it is not inescapably because of parental behavior or their environs that they grew up in. Erickson, Rose. Parents Effect on Child Behavior. 21 Jan. 2010. Web. 14 Sept. 2012. http//www. livestrong. com/article/75282-parents-effect-child-behavior/ In this article, parents are to blame for how their children act. It states how negative examples from parents have a great effect and can cause children to develop bad behavior. The rootage gives particular topics in day to day life that influence how one behaves.I think this article is useful because out of all the articles about childrens bad behavior being a result of their parents, this has the best reasons why. I like how she used examples to show how each topic is the cause and that she backs up her statements. Also I like this article because Rose does not use lyric poem that exceed the average reading level. Oxford University. straightaways Parents Not to Blame for adolescent Problem Behavior. 31 July 2009. Web. 14 Sept. 2012. This website talked about how most people believe that parents are much worse now than they were in earlier generations.It has statistics on how even though most believe it to be the other way around, teenagers and parents are much at hand(predicate) now than in earlier generations. Parents are more likely to know where their kids are and what they are doing. I found this article to be useful because it talks about how there are other factors, such as cell phones, television, and the internet, that can influence ones actions no matter how they were raised. I like this article primarily because it talks about what most articles do not the comparison between earlier generations and this current one.